OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of this course is to give students
an opportunity to engage in an independent study, with limited supervision
and guidance. This will be achieved through a program designed to
expose students to the following:
*data collection
and organization
*data analyses and
statistical competence
*data presentation
and interpretation
*quality scientific
paper writing
*erbal presentation
of research proposals and findings in seminars.
*conduct of oral
examinations and job interviews
The rationale behind offering this course is to prepare students in areas of proposal writing, research interpretation and publication. The course will be taught in a series of lectures and tutorials as well as seminars. Marks will be allocated to all seminar(s) and assignment(s) given both of which contribute to continuous assessment. Such assignments maybe given without notice. Failure of a student to submit an assignment results in that student getting no marks on that particular exercise.
COURSE ORGANIZATION
Lectures and Tutorials Monday
0900-1000 Seminar Room 3 (LM)
Wednesday 0800-0900 Computer Rm/Sem Rm 2 (AN)
Animal Science Seminars Wednesday 1400-1600
Seminar Room 3 (AN)
Research
Mon-Sun - 3 hs/wk Laboratory/ Library/ Computer Assignments Content
*Project report writing
*Communication skills (use of English)
*Statistics and statistical packages
*Data interpretation
GRADING
Variable % contribution
Continuous assessment 20
Seminar 10
Oral examination 10
Final Dissertation 60
Total 100
Continuos Assessment
This comprises project report writing, assignments in
statistics and communication skills and departmental seminars. Such assignments
will be administered by any members of the academic staff involved
in the course. In this respect, the follawing dates are important
as regards submission of components of the, research project. Students
are warned that failure to submit prior to or on the required date results
in the deduction of a total of 10 points for every week late. However,
this does not apply to the Final Bound Dissertation. Failure to submit
the dissertation on 15 October' 1996 automatically means the student
fails the class and will be required to repeat the course the following
year.
Component Due date
* Introduction, Review, Materials and Methods Wed, May 29 1996
* Results and Discussion Wed, Aug. 07 1996
* Completed Bound Dissertation Fri, Oct. 18 1996
Seminars
In term 1, each student is required to present a 10 minute
seminar on their proposal. Presentation should consist of a brief
background, justification, objectives of study and experimental design.
At the end of the year, each student is required give a 20 minute
presentation of his/her project. The presentation will consist of a brief
literature review, objectives, materials and methods, results, discussion
and conclusion or implications of their research.
Within the department, there are departmental seminars
scheduled every Wednesday 14:00 to 16:00 hs, unless stated
otherwise. Attendance to these seminars is COMPULSORY. They contribute
to continuous assessment.
An assignment will be given after every seminar.
Oral Examination
In order to train and impart confidence in students,
it is necessary to conduct mock oral examinations. This will be carried
out during the second and third terms prior to the final examinations.
The advantage of carrying out the examination at this time is that, it
will assist students in their revision and the experience of the examination
will still be fresh in the students' minds when the real oral examination
is conducted at the end of the year.
The end of year oral examination will involve a panel of examiners which comprises the Chairman of Department, External Examiners, Internal Examiner and the Student's Supervisor(s). Just as the mock oral examination, this will include all the courses covered in the whole degree program, their applications to the agricultural industry and the student's project. The examination for each student is scheduled to last 15 minutes.
Assignments and Dissertation
Students should submit well written project assignments
within stipulated deadlines (see above).
Project Preparation and Presentation
This is one of the most important components of the research
protocol. The final research report should provide a concise, but detailed
account of how the research was conducted, results obtained and an
informed interpretation and discussion of what the results mean. The final
report should not exceed 30 pages, inclusive of appendices and tables.
The report must be written in simple English and should be readable to
anyone who needs to follow the research. To standardize reports,
each project report MUST CONFORM to guidelines as outlined in this
communication.
Guidelines for Students
Project Submission
Students must submit three copies of the project, typed
double spaced. A font with fixed character width (Courier 10 cpi)
should be used. All pages, including pages on literature cited, tables,
figures etc, must be numbered consecutively. The numbering of pages should
be at the
top right hand corner of each page.
Preparation of Project Report
The publication by Professor Swappenhauster, "Thesis
Guidelines for the Sciences", should be used as a general reference.
However, the project report should be presented with the following
major headings:
Abstract
Introduction
Objectives
Review of
Literature (Background)
Materials
and Methods (Procedures)
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
or Implications
Literature
Cited (References)
Appendices
In the final project report, all major headings must be centred and highlighted (i.e. bold).
Although what follows is a general guideline as to what is expected to be in the specific sections of the project report, it is the prerogative of the student advisor to guide the student and clarify what is appropriate for any specific project.
Abstract
The abstract appears at the beginning of the project
report, typed single spaced and must not exceed a page. The abstract
should summarize the objective(s), experimental design or how the
experiment was conducted and the pertinent results. The abstract
must conclude with one or two sentences that highlight important
conclusions.
Introduction
The introduction follows the abstract and should not
exceed 1'/2 pages. The introduction briefly states the problem and
justifies the research and specifies the hypotheses to be tested.
The objective(s) of the study should be clearly, but concisely spelt
out. Extensive discussion on relevant literature should be included in
the review of literature, not in the introduction.
Review of Literature
This gives a comprehensive background literature to the
research to be conducted. Information should be limited to relevant
literature pertaining to the study. References should be cited at all times
to support specific biological concepts or statements. Refer to the
Journal of Animal Science for examples of correct referencing within text.
Materials and Methods
Data in this section include all methodology used in
conducting the research, for example, diets, animal (breed, sex, age, weight),
weighing conditions, surgical techniques, physical and chemical
analyses, measurements and statistical models employed. The data
should be presented under relevant sub-headings.
Statistics
Although biology needs to be emphasized, the use of incorrect
or inadequate statistical methods to analyze and interpret data is not
acceptable. It is recommended that students and advisors consult a statistician.
The statistical model, classes, blocks, and experimental units must be
clearly stated. Mention of a statistcal package, e.g. GLM-SAS
model (SAS, 1987) without reporting the sources of variation and other
relevant features of analysis is not sufficient. It is
recommended that students understand experimental design(s)
used to allow them to make meaningful inference.
Results
Results may be combined with discussion, i.e. Results
and Discussion. However, if the results are presented on their own
section, there is no need for discussion within that section. When feasible,
results should be presented in tabular form. Where results are tabulated,
text should briefly explain or elaborate on tabular data, but numbers should
not be repeated extensively within the text. Statistical levels of
significance, e.g., P < 0.05 should be included in data presentation
in the results section.
Discussion
The discussion (which may be included with results) should
interpret the results clearly and concisely in terms of biological
mechanisms and significance, in context with available literature.
Statistical levels of significance must not be included in the discussion,
nor an explanation of materials and methods. Citations of literature
should accompany biological phenomena and explanations.
Conclusion (or Implications)
This section summarizes the major findings of the project
(in a few sentences) and indicates what the findings of the research
imply to animal production and(or) biology. The conclusions
should also highlight further areas of research generated from the present
findings.
Literature Cited
All references cited should be arranged chronologically
in text and listed in alphabetical order at the end. Examples of referencing
to be used in the project report can be obtained from any recent Journal
of Animal Science publication.
Appendices
To provide advisors and examiners (internal and external)
with full information, this section should contain summaries of collected
and tested data, such as measurements, and give detail on analytical
procedures used (examples of statistical analyses such as a
table of Analysis of Variance, or student t-test must be included).
Communication Skis
This will be a taught section of AS360 and will include
tutorials. The objectives of this section are to empower students with
skills in the use of library services, computers, data interpretation,
scientific writing, seminar presentation and handling oral examinations
and job interviews. This section of the course will also attempt to encourage
students to participate during discussions in departmental seminars and
farm visits.
The main criticism coming from the External Examiners
of last year was the inadequate presentation of results, discussion and
conclusion by most students. In some cases, the conclusion and abstract
were totally missing from some dissertations. This was in contrast to well
researched introductions, reviews as well as good procedures. In an attempt
to correct this problem, supervisors of students are encouraged to remind
their students that submission of Results and Discussion have been brought
forward.
Other Menus:
Agriculture
Economics
Agricultural
Engineering
Crop
Sciences
Soil
Sciences