What are we learning about spotted wing Drosophila management in berries this season?
The third growing season of spotted wing Drosophila brings new insights into its management.
Spotted wing drosophila (SWD) continues to be a significant pest in berry crops, and this season has again highlighted the need for growers to adopt intensive integrated pest management (IPM) programs to maintain fruit quality. While some producers have had challenges with this pest, most Michigan berry growers have been successful in controlling SWD. These experiences, coupled with our ongoing research, can help guide the improvement of management programs over time. This article provides an update from the experiences this summer to help inform growers to manage this pest during the rest of the 2013 season, and to help prepare for 2014.
There are some recurring themes in situations where SWD problems have developed. Below, Michigan State University Extension addresses the situations that are associated with SWD problems including what we are learning this season about insecticide efficacy. Some comments are provided on how to rectify the situation in the short- and long-term. Some of these fixes are relatively simple, while others will take time and money to resolve.
SWD inhabits the wooded habitats adjacent to crop fields, developing in wild berry-bearing plants that serve as alternate hosts to SWD. We are seeing higher pest pressure at these borders than at fields away from wooded edges, and on top of this these wooded edges can be harder to treat with aerial application. In response, growers are enhancing their SWD management program with border applications to ensure that field borders are well protected. A cannon-type sprayer can be used in this way to reduce immigration of flies into crop fields.
Another approach to help reduce the risk of load rejection by processors is to pick separate loads for the parts of the field near the woods and away from woods. For machine harvesting, this only works well at fields with woods next to the long edge of the rows.
Chemical controls can work only if they are applied in ways that protect all the berries from SWD. This requires excellent coverage of the crop, and there are multiple ways to achieve this. Growers are having success using sprayers operating from the ground and from the air, but both of these approaches have their drawbacks. Driving a sprayer through fields knocks off berries and reduces yield, so there is an understandable temptation to skip a larger number of rows. However, even tower sprayers that have nozzles to direct spray into adjacent rows may not be able to achieve high coverage if the tractor is skipping more than a few rows at a time. While this approach has worked in the past for blueberry maggots and Japanese beetles that are active in the tops of bushes, SWD likes the shady parts of the canopy that are more challenging to penetrate with the sprayer.
Getting coverage with any sprayer design becomes more challenging as the canopy density increases, so effective control of SWD may require some changes to have well-pruned bushes, not skipping too many rows when spraying, and using higher water gallonage. Making adjustments to ensure excellent coverage may need to be part of planning ahead for 2014.
Using the most effective insecticides
From grower experiences this season and our recent research, we provide an updated list of highly effective insecticides for SWD control:
- Organophosphate Imidan
- Pyrethroids Mustang Max and Danitol
- Carbamate Lannate
- Spinosyn Delegate (or Entrust if growing organic berries)
Rotation among these insecticides is expected to provide the best opportunity for control of SWD while also minimizing the risk of resistance development. Reapplication is needed to keep high levels of crop protection, and a seven-day interval has been working well for many growers.
Malathion has worked well for some growers again this season, but if weather conditions become very hot, we caution growers against the use of this insecticide due to expected negative effect on its performance. This statement is based on the good control seen with Malathion 8F at the 2.5 pint per acre rate in our 2012 trials, compared with the much less effective performance we have seen in our 2013 trial. We suspect this difference is because of temperature, in that our 2012 trial was run when the daily maximum high temperatures were in the 70s and low 80s, whereas the 2013 trial was run when the temperatures were in the high 80s and low 90s, thereby reducing Malathion performance. Under these same hot conditions, Mustang and Danitol performed well out to seven days after treatment in our trial this year.
Reapplication after rain
If SWD have been detected and fruit are ripe or ripening, they will need to be protected from this pest. The duration of protection varies by insecticide, but it is highly sensitive to rainfall – most insecticides we have tested lose the ability to protect berries from SWD after rain. We therefore recommend reapplication after any significant rainfall, and failure to do this will leave fruit exposed to egglaying by SWD.
This article shows that we are continuing to learn about SWD and how to combat it, but there is still more work to be done. This is an evolving area of pest management research and we welcome continued input from growers, processors and others on SWD management concerns.
For more on SWD management, check out the MSU Spotted Wing Drosophila website.
Did you find this article useful?