The Political Economy of Fertilizer Subsidy Programs in Africa

January 9, 2017 - Author: Nicole M. Mason, Thomas S. Jayne, Nicolas van de Walle

By Nicole M. Mason, Thomas S. Jayne, Nicolas van de Walle


ZambiaInputsubsidies-500PXFertilizer subsidy programs have re-emerged as popular policy tools in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite a burgeoning body of literature on program impacts, the political economy of the programs remains poorly understood. In particular, there is a dearth of empirical evidence to support or refute the conventional wisdoms that governments systematically target subsidized inputs to certain areas based on past voting patterns and that fertilizer subsidies win votes.

This article discusses the theoretical links between government targeting of subsidized fertilizer and voter behavior, then uses panel data from Zambia to empirically test these conventional wisdoms. Results suggest that Zambia’s Movement for Multi-Party Democracy governments targeted more subsidized fertilizer to households in areas where it had strong support in the previous presidential election. However, contrary to conventional wisdom, marginal changes in the scale or coverage of the fertilizer subsidy program had no statistically significant effect on the share or number of votes won by incumbent presidents.

Tags: c1/c2, c4a, fertilizer, fsg news, fsp featured article, fsp news, zambia


Related Topic Areas

Zambia, C4a, C1-C2


Authors

Nicole Mason-Wardell

Nicole Mason-Wardell
517-432-4446
masonn@msu.edu

Thomas Jayne

Thomas Jayne
517-432-9802
jayne@msu.edu


For more information visit:

Food Security Group
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy

Michigan State University Michigan State University Close Menu button Menu and Search button Open Close