Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design

January 1, 2012 - Author: Jennifer L. Shirk, Heidi L. Ballard, Candie C. Wilderman, Tina Phillips, Andrea Wiggins, , Ellen McCallie, Matthew Minarchek, Bruce V. Lewenstein, Marianne E. Krasny, Rick Bonney

Abstract

Members of the public participate in scientific research in many different contexts, stemming from traditions as varied as participatory action research and citizen science. Particularly in conservation and natural resource management contexts, where research often addresses complex social–ecological questions, the emphasis on and nature of this participation can significantly affect both the way that projects are designed and the outcomes that projects achieve. We review and integrate recent work in these and other fields, which has converged such that we propose the term public participation in scientific research (PPSR) to discuss initiatives from diverse fields and traditions. We describe three predominant models of PPSR and call upon case studies suggesting that—regardless of the research context—project outcomes are influenced by (1) the degree of public participation in the research process and (2) the quality of public participation as negotiated during project design. To illustrate relationships between the quality of participation and outcomes, we offer a framework that considers how scientific and public interests are negotiated for project design toward multiple, integrated goals. We suggest that this framework and models, used in tandem, can support deliberate design of PPSR efforts that will enhance their outcomes for scientific research, individual participants, and social–ecological systems.

Keywords

citizen science, community-based monitoring, conservation, outcomes, participation, public, volunteer monitoring

Suggested Citation

Shirk, J. L., H. L. Ballard, C. C. Wilderman, T. Phillips, A. Wiggins, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, M. Minarchek, B. V. Lewenstein, M. E. Krasny, and R. Bonney. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17(2): 29.

View full article

Tags: citizen science, community-based monitoring, conservation, flint leverage points, outcomes, public volunteer monitoring


Related Topic Areas

Urban Food Systems in Flint, Michigan: Identifying Leverage Points


Authors

Rebecca Jordan

Rebecca Jordan
jordanre@msu.edu

Michigan State University Michigan State University Close Menu button Menu and Search button Open Close