Dividing the waters: The case for hydrologic separation of the North American Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins

DOWNLOAD

June 29, 2011 - Jerry L. Rasmussen, Henry A. Regier, Richard E. Sparks, William W. Taylor

Journal or Book Title: Journal of Great Lakes Research

Keywords: Invasive species; North American Great Lakes; Mississippi River Basin; Biodiversity threats; Risk assessment; Legislation

Year Published: 2011

Legislation has been introduced this year in the U.S. Congress, but not yet enacted, that would direct the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to complete a study of the options that would prevent the spread of aquatic nuisance species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins. Hydrologic separation is the only option which closes the aquatic connection between the two basins and does not require continuous operation and maintenance of various technologies that have some risk of failure. The one-time, capital cost to separate the two basins is widely acknowledged to be high, and the outstanding question is whether the costs are justified given the significant risk of future ecological damages and long-term economic losses. Interests opposing separation have mounted a public campaign that the news media have picked up to deny that hydrologic separation should be considered or that a problem even exists.

The campaign rests on four assertions:

(1) existing electric barriers in the Chicago canals are effective; (2) it is too late–the carps are already in the

Great Lakes or soon will be; (3) Asian carps will not thrive in the Great Lakes due to inadequate food and

spawning habitat; and (4) Asian carps are unlikely to cause serious harm. Our review of these assertions and the ecological and socio-economic threats to both basins supports our recommendation that the pending legislation be passed and that it include analysis of hydrologic separation of the two basins.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2011.05.01

Type of Publication: Journal Article

DOWNLOAD FILE

Authors

You Might Also Be Interested In

Accessibility Questions:

For questions about accessibility and/or if you need additional accommodations for a specific document, please send an email to ANR Communications & Marketing at anrcommunications@anr.msu.edu.

Tag List
  • biodiversity threats,
  • center for systems integration and sustainability,
  • invasive species,
  • legislation,
  • mississippi river basin,
  • north american great lakes,
  • risk assessment
Michigan State University
  • Spartans Will.
  • © Michigan State University

MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer, committed to achieving excellence through a diverse workforce and inclusive culture that encourages all people to reach their full potential.

Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, religion, age, height, weight, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, family status or veteran status. Issued in furtherance of MSU Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Quentin Tyler, Director, MSU Extension, East Lansing, MI 48824. This information is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names does not imply endorsement by MSU Extension or bias against those not mentioned.

The 4-H Name and Emblem have special protections from Congress, protected by code 18 USC 707.

We comply with the Federal Trade Commission 1998 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).