Reports of high honey bee colony losses and how farmers and growers can support honey bees

Several migratory beekeepers recently reported abnormally high losses of honey bee colonies, however, losses vary across operations. Farmers and growers can support honey bee health by increasing forage and reducing pesticide exposure.

Honey bee hives on pallets in an almond orchard.
Commercial honey bee colonies in almond pollination in California. Photo by Dan Wyns, MSU.

This article was originally published on April 1, 2025. It was updated on December 8, 2025, to reflect test results and new information.

Several migratory, commercial beekeeping operations reported high losses of honey bee colonies in late 2024 and early 2025. According to a survey of beekeepers administered by Project Apis m., commercial operations reported an average loss of 62% between June 2024 and February 2025. These losses are much higher than the average annual honey bee losses typically reported by beekeepers, which is typically around 30-50%. According to a press release issued by Project Apis m., the Honey Bee Health Coalition, the American Beekeeping Federation, and the American Honey Producers, “Around 1.6 million colonies were lost with associated economic impacts on beekeepers are estimated at over $600 million in lost honey production, pollination income, and costs to replace colonies.”  U.S. Department of Agriculture and university researchers are processing samples to try to identify causes for the colony losses, but the causes of the higher losses are currently unknown.

The 2023-2024 U.S. Beekeeping Survey found that 55.1% of managed honey bee colonies were reported as lost from April 1, 2023 to April 1, 2024, according to voluntary survey respondents. While several large-scale beekeeping operations reported abnormally high losses of honey bee colonies, others reported fairly standard losses. 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and university researchers collected samples to try to identify causes for the colony loses. Researchers from the USDA found high levels of deformed wing virus A and B and acute bee paralysis as well as varroa mites resistant to amitraz, a commonly used miticide. It should be noted that these results were from 120 honey bee colonies, which is a small number relevant to the number of colonies that were lost and the total population. A list of frequently asked questions and responses about the research explains that pesticide analyses and testing for new or previously unknown diseases are ongoing, and their results have not yet been publicized.

Honey bees face many stressors that can contribute to losses: 

  • Varroa mites are a parasite found in all honey bee colonies in the United States. These mites spread viruses, which can lead to colony loss. Beekeepers manage varroa mites, but the efficacy of miticides can vary, and there is resistance to some products. 
  • Forage and habitat loss can lead to lack of adequate nutrition and can make honey bees more susceptible to other stressors. 
  • Climate change and weather patterns can reduce nectar and pollen availability or limit foraging conditions. 
  • Exposure to pesticides can kill honey bees outright or lead to sublethal effects, such as impaired memory and learning, reduced foraging, reduced lifespans, leading to weakened colonies and increased colony mortality. Many insecticides are acutely toxic to honey bees. Although formulated to manage fungi, many fungicides can have chronic effects on bees. Some combinations of pesticides applied at the same time can have synergistic effects, making them much more toxic to bees than they would be if they were applied separately. Finally, some inert ingredients, such as adjuvants, can be harmful to bees, even though they are not active ingredients in pesticide products. 

Farmers and growers can support honey bees by reducing pesticide exposure and toxicity and increasing honey bee forage.  

Additional information on reports of honey bee colony losses 

Acknowledgements 

This work is supported by Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development with funding secured from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for Michigan State University to implement strategies in the Managed Pollinator Protection Plan. 

This work is supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Program [grant no 2024-70006-43569] from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 

This work is supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Program, project award no. 2022-70006-38001, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

 

Did you find this article useful?