Area Mismeasurement Impact on Farmers’ Input Choices and Productivity


December 21, 2019 - Author: William J. Burke, Stephen N. Morgan, , and Nicole M. Mason

William J. Burke, Stephen N. Morgan, Thelma Namonje, Milu Muyanga and Nicole M. Mason, 2019. Area Mismeasurement Impact on Farmers’ Input Choices and Productivity, FSP Research Brief 106, East Lansing: Michigan State University.

Key Findings

  • Comparing self-reported to GPS measurements, we find farmers frequently mis-state the size of their fields in survey data
  • Although errors are often made in either direction on all field sizes, we find evidence that, on average, smaller fields tend to overstate and larger fields tend to understate actual field size.
  • Input application rates are more consistent with self-reported area than GPS-measured area, suggesting farmers believe the inaccurate data they provide.
  • Productivity itself and productivity measurement are hampered by area measurement errors in self- reported data, highlighting important deficiencies in data collection and farmer training.


Tags: c1-c2, fsg policy brief, fsp policy brief, input use and market development, land, sustainable agricultural intensification, zambia

Related Topic Areas

Zambia, C1-C2


Thelma Namonje

Thelma Namonje

Milu Muyanga

Milu Muyanga

Nicole Mason-Wardell

Nicole Mason-Wardell

For more information visit:

Food Security Group
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy

Accessibility Questions:

For questions about accessibility and/or if you need additional accommodations for a specific document, please send an email to ANR Communications & Marketing at