NOVEL CORONAVIRUS UPDATES AND RESOURCES

Area Mismeasurement Impact on Farmers’ Input Choices and Productivity

DOWNLOAD FILE

December 21, 2019 - Author: William J. Burke, Stephen N. Morgan, , and Nicole M. Mason

William J. Burke, Stephen N. Morgan, Thelma Namonje, Milu Muyanga and Nicole M. Mason, 2019. Area Mismeasurement Impact on Farmers’ Input Choices and Productivity, FSP Research Brief 106, East Lansing: Michigan State University.

Key Findings

  • Comparing self-reported to GPS measurements, we find farmers frequently mis-state the size of their fields in survey data
  • Although errors are often made in either direction on all field sizes, we find evidence that, on average, smaller fields tend to overstate and larger fields tend to understate actual field size.
  • Input application rates are more consistent with self-reported area than GPS-measured area, suggesting farmers believe the inaccurate data they provide.
  • Productivity itself and productivity measurement are hampered by area measurement errors in self- reported data, highlighting important deficiencies in data collection and farmer training.

DOWNLOAD FILE

Tags: c1-c2, fsg policy brief, fsp policy brief, input use and market development, land, sustainable agricultural intensification, zambia


Related Topic Areas

Zambia, C1-C2


Authors

Thelma Namonje

Thelma Namonje
namonjet@msu.edu

Milu Muyanga

Milu Muyanga
muyangam@msu.edu

Nicole Mason-Wardell

Nicole Mason-Wardell
517-432-4446
masonn@msu.edu


For more information visit:

Food Security Group
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy

Accessibility Questions:

For questions about accessibility and/or if you need additional accommodations for a specific document, please send an email to ANR Communications & Marketing at anrcommunications@anr.msu.edu.